Volume 7, Number 2 (Volume 7, Number 2 2016)                   jdc 2016, 7(2): 66-73 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohammadi S, Khazaeli P, Shamsi Meymandi S, Aflatoonian M, Khalili Meybodi M, Mehrolhasani N, et al . Comparison of the efficacy of isotretinoin 0.05% niosomal gel versus adapalen 0.1% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. jdc. 2016; 7 (2) :66-73
URL: http://jdc.tums.ac.ir/article-1-5188-en.html

1- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
2- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
4- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran , mehrolhasaniniloofar@gmail.com
5- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Abstract:   (2790 Views)

Background and Aim: Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit. Retinoids are used as the first line therapy in acne. Systemic absorption and skin irritation including redness, pruritus and exfoliation are some of their side effects. In this study we compared the efficacy of isotretinoin 0.05% niosomal gel versus adapalen 0.1% gel in treatment of acne vulgaris.

Methods: In this randomized double blind clinical trial, 144 patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris aged from 15 to 30 years were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups of A, whom were treated with isotretinoin 0.05% niosomal gel and B whom were treated with adapalen 0.1% gel. The patients were evaluated for clinical reponse, decrease in the number of inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions and side effects after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of the initiation of treatment.

Results: At the end of the study the clinical responses of comedones and inflammatory lesions in isotretinoin 0.05% niosomal gel group were 68% and 79%, in comparison with 65% and 76% in the adapalen gel group,  respectively. The differences were not statistically significant. At the end of the treatment period more decrease in number of inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesions were seen in group A patients (niosomal isotretinoin) than group B (adapalen 0.1% gel) (P<0.001). Also side effect of skin redness was found more in group B (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Isotretinoin 0.05% niosomal gel has less side effects and more efficacy in the treatment of mild to moderate acne vulgaris in comparison with adapalen 0.1% gel.

Full-Text [PDF 369 kb]   (699 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2016/09/18 | Accepted: 2016/09/18 | Published: 2016/09/18

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author


© 2017 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Dermatology and Cosmetic

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb